![]() So we see that this argument from Northern animalrights is definitely an example of Gish Gallop. However, lacking the time to provide answer for each one of his points in turn I am open for the “one single proof fallacy”. Spurious claims that morphine has the opposite effect on cats have been debunked countless times by scientists, as have most of the other points. The technique also takes advantage of the one single proof fallacy, since if a respondent only manages to refute 99 out of 100 points there is still one point that proves the galloper correct. The gallop must consist of as many points as possible, and even old and worn out arguments are useful in overwhelming the respondent and bamboozling the audience. It is often successfully combined with the “point refuted a thousand times” ( PRATT). The gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority, as it appears to paint the “galloper” as an expert in a broad range of subjects Most of which are already debunked on the ‘Bad Science’ section of our website. Not once, but twice our confused activist posts a list of 24 factually incoherent soundbites. In written form, a Gish Gallop is most commonly observed as a long list of supposed facts or reasons, … The individual points must also be fairly terse often to the point where, individually, each point is easy to refute because it simply proves nothing. I wanted to see how well that described to the diatribe above. The Rational Wiki have a page dedicated to explaining Gish Gallop. Click to Enlarge this example of Gish Gallop from the Facebook User “Nothern Animalrights” Not convinced that a few well developed lines of thought were suitable, many animal rights activists prefer to take a machine gun approach, hoping that some stray bullet will be the one necessary to convince their opposition.Īfter our recent annoucnement about the Science Action Network, an animal rights activist called “Northern animalrights” decided to come to our Facebook page to lay down the “facts” about animal research. While this term was originally coined by Eugenie Scott to describe the arguing techniques of creationists, much the same tactics are employed by opponents of animal research. This leaves some points unanswered and allows the original speaker to try and claim his opponent lacks the counter-arguments. Gish Gallop is a technique, named after the creationist Duane Gish who employed it, whereby someone argues a cause by hurling as many different half-truths and no-truths into a very short space of time so that their opponent cannot hope to combat each point in real time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |